Apparently, it's not easy going for tourist trap hacks and luxury travel businesses in Italy lately. Blaming the global economic downturn--and suddenly tighter-wadded American tourists--this New York Times article helps a few of the least practical exemplars of travel-related business bemoan the state of their finances.
Whether you're a pointless tourist trap (a cheesy gladiator by the Colosseum no one wants to pay to pose beside, a glum horse-drawn-carriage driver with no passengers) or a pointlessly overpriced hotel or restaurant (the Exelsior bar in the Westin Hotel on Rome's Via Veneto--which went out of fashion 40 years ago--or the lovely but ridiculously priced Hotel Danieli in Venice, which has had to "slash" its prices to a mere $335 a night), no tourist seems to want to crack open his or her wallet and pay for your services.
To which I say: Good for the tourists. The only reason most people assume they can't afford a trip to Italy--which, even in this economic climate, they can--is that msot newspapers and magazines make it sound as if you _need_ to spend $20 for a martini, $150 for dinner, and $650 for a double room.
That's not only wrong, it's elitist and it's ridiculous.
Patronize mom-and-pop hotels and B&Bs and you'll never pay more than $200 for a room (and often well less than $100), eat at family-run trattorie and you can dine like a king on unforgettable Italian home-cooking for $20 to $30. What's more, those prices are even better now than they were just a few months ago, as the Euro has slipped against the dollar from the dizzying highs of $1.60 = €1 during this past summer to around $1.30 = €1. That's like a 30¢ discount on every dollar you spend, relatively speaking. That's money you can take the the bank...and spend in Italy.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Frenchmen + Scooters = The New Alitalia
Well, last week brought the news that Italy's bankrupt "flag-carrier" airline, Alitalia, had finally been sold to a group of private investors headed by the chair of Piaggio--the Tuscan company that makes most of Italy's motor scooters (yes, including Vespas).
Their very first, rather un-encouraging, statement was that they were shopping around for another partner, preferably another major airline. It was no big secret that Air France/KLM was the one being wooed, and now they've made it official. Air France now owns a 25% share of the new Altialia.
Alrady, thigns are looking a bit confusing. On Monday, Bloomberg News reported that the plan woudl be to make Rome-Fiurmicino and Milan-Malpensa into hubs on the same level as Paris-CDG and Amsterdam-Shciphol. One can only hope.
Then today (Wednesday, Jan 13) Bloomberg turned around and said that Air France seems to be indicating that Alitalia's effort to keep both Rome and Milan as equal hubs was unsustainable.
They seemed to be framing it as the old Italian bickering between north and south, but it really seems to be more businessmen versus tourists. The Air France-KLM CEO said that ""Italy is not a big enough market to support two airport bases offering intercontinental flights," and so far all indications are that these besuited businessmen are aiming to make Milan the major hub. This might make sense to someone going over to ink a manufacturing deal or engage in a little international finance, but Rome is still top of the charts for most leisure travelers (the majority of whom don't want to spend more time in Milan than it takes to see The Last Supper).
Unlike other failed an relaunched European airlines like Sabena and Swiss Air, Alitalia will not be rebranding itself--at least, not yet. The planes, logos, flight attendant uniforms, and name will all stay the same, but do expect to see the number and frequeny of flights decrease even further.
No worries, though: no-frills airlines like Ryanair are already staking their claims to take up the slack and become major players in the domestic and regional Italy air market. Nothing like a little healthy competition to keep fares down and open new markets and routes, eh? So long as the new Alitalia stays healthy and solvent, this can only mean good news for travelers.
Their very first, rather un-encouraging, statement was that they were shopping around for another partner, preferably another major airline. It was no big secret that Air France/KLM was the one being wooed, and now they've made it official. Air France now owns a 25% share of the new Altialia.
Alrady, thigns are looking a bit confusing. On Monday, Bloomberg News reported that the plan woudl be to make Rome-Fiurmicino and Milan-Malpensa into hubs on the same level as Paris-CDG and Amsterdam-Shciphol. One can only hope.
Then today (Wednesday, Jan 13) Bloomberg turned around and said that Air France seems to be indicating that Alitalia's effort to keep both Rome and Milan as equal hubs was unsustainable.
They seemed to be framing it as the old Italian bickering between north and south, but it really seems to be more businessmen versus tourists. The Air France-KLM CEO said that ""Italy is not a big enough market to support two airport bases offering intercontinental flights," and so far all indications are that these besuited businessmen are aiming to make Milan the major hub. This might make sense to someone going over to ink a manufacturing deal or engage in a little international finance, but Rome is still top of the charts for most leisure travelers (the majority of whom don't want to spend more time in Milan than it takes to see The Last Supper).
Unlike other failed an relaunched European airlines like Sabena and Swiss Air, Alitalia will not be rebranding itself--at least, not yet. The planes, logos, flight attendant uniforms, and name will all stay the same, but do expect to see the number and frequeny of flights decrease even further.
No worries, though: no-frills airlines like Ryanair are already staking their claims to take up the slack and become major players in the domestic and regional Italy air market. Nothing like a little healthy competition to keep fares down and open new markets and routes, eh? So long as the new Alitalia stays healthy and solvent, this can only mean good news for travelers.
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Just in time for Christmas: A Holy Tour of Italy
Trafalgar Tours, one of the largest and best-regarded group tour companies in the world, has announced a new, 10-day trip focused on Italy's sizable religious heritage called "A Journey though Christian Italy." It visits Rome, Assisi, Siena, Florence, Padova, and Venice, paying respect to Saints Francis, Clare, Anthony, Catherine, and Mark--along with visits to the major tourists sights and museums as well (Sistine Chapel, Uffizi Galleries, etc.).
The price starts at $1,995 (for June 16, July 14, and Aug. 25 departures; Sept. 8 costs $2,095; Sept. 22 and Oct. 6 cost $2,195), which covers all transportation, first-class hotels, tour guides, museum and sight entry tickets, and breakfasts, along with two lunches and two dinners. Sadly, the price does not include airfare. (I suggest checking rates at airfare aggregator Momondo.com and consolidator AutoEurope/1800FlyEruope.)
A few notes on the phenomenon of religious tourism. Regardless of your personal religious beliefs, one fact is immutable: the earliest tourists were all either traders/merchants or pilgrims. The medieval version of the Grand Tour was to travel to various churches, basilicas, and holy spots, paying your respects, attending services, and casting your eyes upon 101 different miraculous holy relics along the way.
Many people still visit Italy primarily for the religious aspects--Assisi isn't that consistently popular (and crowded) just for the Giotto frescoes, you know. One that that has surprised me when bumping into pilgrims--either in groups or individually, at sights or when staying at convents and monasteries--is that most of them aren't even Catholic. Protestants eager to see the foundations of the Christian church flock to Italy as well.
The price starts at $1,995 (for June 16, July 14, and Aug. 25 departures; Sept. 8 costs $2,095; Sept. 22 and Oct. 6 cost $2,195), which covers all transportation, first-class hotels, tour guides, museum and sight entry tickets, and breakfasts, along with two lunches and two dinners. Sadly, the price does not include airfare. (I suggest checking rates at airfare aggregator Momondo.com and consolidator AutoEurope/1800FlyEruope.)
A few notes on the phenomenon of religious tourism. Regardless of your personal religious beliefs, one fact is immutable: the earliest tourists were all either traders/merchants or pilgrims. The medieval version of the Grand Tour was to travel to various churches, basilicas, and holy spots, paying your respects, attending services, and casting your eyes upon 101 different miraculous holy relics along the way.
Many people still visit Italy primarily for the religious aspects--Assisi isn't that consistently popular (and crowded) just for the Giotto frescoes, you know. One that that has surprised me when bumping into pilgrims--either in groups or individually, at sights or when staying at convents and monasteries--is that most of them aren't even Catholic. Protestants eager to see the foundations of the Christian church flock to Italy as well.
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Air-car packages to Italy from $557
Auto Europe is offering a fantastically priced deal to Italy that bundles together airfare and a rental car. (Just go to the site and click on "Specials.")
Rates start at $557 per person for round-trip airfare and three days with a rental car to fly into Florence or Venice from Boston or New York ($619 from Miami or Chicago). $557 is also the price from Boston to Milan; for some odd reason, the price jumps to $579 for flights to Rome from New York and Boston, $647 for flights to Rome from Miami and Chicago.
Those are the prices for winter travel (Dec. 26, 2008 to Mar. 31, 2009; rates go up by more than 50% in spring), and don't include fuel surcharges of $264 to $330 (other government fees, taxes, and surcharges can add up to an additional $195.)
By the way, three days with a car is perfect for a trip of a week or two. Figure you'd be better off getting around by train to link the big cities, and rally only need a car for exploring hilltowns and vineyards and such. So on a typical 8-day trip (leave Friday night, return the following Sunday), you could fly to Rome, spend three days there, then take the train to Florence and spend two days there, then pick up your rental car to spend the last three days driving back through the hilltowns of Tuscany and Umbria on your way to Rome's airport to depart. Perfect.
Rates start at $557 per person for round-trip airfare and three days with a rental car to fly into Florence or Venice from Boston or New York ($619 from Miami or Chicago). $557 is also the price from Boston to Milan; for some odd reason, the price jumps to $579 for flights to Rome from New York and Boston, $647 for flights to Rome from Miami and Chicago.
Those are the prices for winter travel (Dec. 26, 2008 to Mar. 31, 2009; rates go up by more than 50% in spring), and don't include fuel surcharges of $264 to $330 (other government fees, taxes, and surcharges can add up to an additional $195.)
By the way, three days with a car is perfect for a trip of a week or two. Figure you'd be better off getting around by train to link the big cities, and rally only need a car for exploring hilltowns and vineyards and such. So on a typical 8-day trip (leave Friday night, return the following Sunday), you could fly to Rome, spend three days there, then take the train to Florence and spend two days there, then pick up your rental car to spend the last three days driving back through the hilltowns of Tuscany and Umbria on your way to Rome's airport to depart. Perfect.
Googlus mapus for ancient Rome
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to ancient Rome! You've seen it on the History Channel, and now you, too, can fly through the eerily abandoned streets of a clearly computer-generated Ancient Rome thanks to Google Earth: earth.google.com/rome
In conjunction with Rome Reborn, the folks at Google Earth have recreated a 3-D map of ancient Rome more or less how it appeared in the year 320 AD. Coolest bit: you can even fly into some of the buildings, like the Basilica Giulia law courts in the Roman Forum.
(Note this is not one of those things you can just see on Google's site using your Web browser; you have to download the separate Google Earth application--which if you don't already have, is amazingly cool and free. It's what the Evening News and CNN and such now use to zoom in on trouble spots in the news).
In conjunction with Rome Reborn, the folks at Google Earth have recreated a 3-D map of ancient Rome more or less how it appeared in the year 320 AD. Coolest bit: you can even fly into some of the buildings, like the Basilica Giulia law courts in the Roman Forum.
(Note this is not one of those things you can just see on Google's site using your Web browser; you have to download the separate Google Earth application--which if you don't already have, is amazingly cool and free. It's what the Evening News and CNN and such now use to zoom in on trouble spots in the news).
Italy prepares for a trains versus planes smackdown
The Economist reports that, not only are low-cost carriers like Ryanair and easyJet giving the eternally-in-peril Alitalia a run for its money on some domestic air routes (more on that in a moment), but that the trains are shaping up to be an even better option on long hauls.
A new high-speed track on the Bologna-Milan line will cut 30 minutes off the travel time; by the end of 2009, a similar project should be finished for Bologna-Florence, slashing travel time from 60 to 30 minutes.
Planes still sound faster, right. Well remember: A 90 minute flight actually eats up approximately five hours of your time (give yourself an hour on each end to get to and from the airports, check in at least an hour early for your flight, and pad that with another 30 minutes for luggage retrieval, missed airport trains, and the wise decision to arrive at the airport a wee bit early).
Still, you can't argue with low prices from no-frills airlines--and air connections are a lot faster than trains for going from, say, Milan down to Apulia or Sicily.
The article cites only easyJet's new route connecting Rome's Fiumicino airport with Milan's Malpensa airport, but know that easyJet also flies from Rome to Bari and Palermo, and from Milan to Naples, Apulia (Bari, Brindisi), Sicily (Palermo, Catania), Lamezia, and Sardegna (Cagliari and Olbia).
Meanwhile, Ryanair--which is making a strong bid to oust Alitalia from its own market--now flies from Milan to Rome, Apulia (Bari, Brindisi), Sicily (Palermo, Trapani), Lamezia, and Sardegna (Cagliari, and Alghero); from Rome to Milan, Venice, Trapani, and Sardegna (Cagliari, Alghero); from Bologna to Apulia (Bari, Brindisi), Lamezia, and Sicily (Trapani); and from Pisa to Bari, Lamezia, Sicily (Palermo, Trapani), and Sardegna (Caglieri, Alghero).
Also in the article: more news on the announced rival to the Italian state railways that is aiming to provide high-speed service between Rome, Milan Turin/Torino), and Venice in 2011.
A new high-speed track on the Bologna-Milan line will cut 30 minutes off the travel time; by the end of 2009, a similar project should be finished for Bologna-Florence, slashing travel time from 60 to 30 minutes.
Planes still sound faster, right. Well remember: A 90 minute flight actually eats up approximately five hours of your time (give yourself an hour on each end to get to and from the airports, check in at least an hour early for your flight, and pad that with another 30 minutes for luggage retrieval, missed airport trains, and the wise decision to arrive at the airport a wee bit early).
Still, you can't argue with low prices from no-frills airlines--and air connections are a lot faster than trains for going from, say, Milan down to Apulia or Sicily.
The article cites only easyJet's new route connecting Rome's Fiumicino airport with Milan's Malpensa airport, but know that easyJet also flies from Rome to Bari and Palermo, and from Milan to Naples, Apulia (Bari, Brindisi), Sicily (Palermo, Catania), Lamezia, and Sardegna (Cagliari and Olbia).
Meanwhile, Ryanair--which is making a strong bid to oust Alitalia from its own market--now flies from Milan to Rome, Apulia (Bari, Brindisi), Sicily (Palermo, Trapani), Lamezia, and Sardegna (Cagliari, and Alghero); from Rome to Milan, Venice, Trapani, and Sardegna (Cagliari, Alghero); from Bologna to Apulia (Bari, Brindisi), Lamezia, and Sicily (Trapani); and from Pisa to Bari, Lamezia, Sicily (Palermo, Trapani), and Sardegna (Caglieri, Alghero).
Also in the article: more news on the announced rival to the Italian state railways that is aiming to provide high-speed service between Rome, Milan Turin/Torino), and Venice in 2011.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
